The modern middle and working classes, the ‘common man’, has long been taken for granted by the political and media establishments. These common men and women make up the bulk of the workforce. They go about their daily business trying to be law abiding citizens who pay their taxes on time, raise their families by trying to give them every opportunity to succeed in a competitive world, and generally work hard, keep their heads down and try and live and let live.
This very compliance has made them easy prey to society’s vultures. On the one hand they have been fleeced of their savings by rich bankers and money managers who gambled their money on derivatives, property bubbles and currency trading. On the other, they have been pick-pocketed by those who don’t want to work, who come from a different culture looking for a better life, or who feel they are owed a living.
In short, the middle and working classes have become the meat in the sandwich between the have and have-nots, both of whom dine on them rapaciously.
For their pains they have been treated like pariahs by a left wing mainstream media establishment that has sought to keep them in their place by making sure they feel perpetual guilt. Guilty for the alleged sins of their fathers, guilty for being predominantly white, guilty because they have been told over and over again that their culture has been bought at the expense predominantly black people, guilty for ruining the planet, guilty for not accepting the norms of a totally different culture and religion, etc etc. The list of their sins is long. Consequently, their social and political lives have, for nearly fifty years, been a perpetual round of abasement, apology, and appeasement.
Above all these common men and women are supposed to take it on the chin and say nothing.
Yet underneath lies a dormant, seething anger borne of frustration and a deep sense of the injustice of it all.
..…and then along comes Donald Trump in America and Nigel Farage of UKIP and Brexit (British exit from the European Union) in the UK and knocks the political and media establishments for six.
While the political and media establishments struggle to understand what is happening in the USA and the UK, the common man knows just fine. He is sick and tired of political correctness, of having his freedom of speech undermined, of being made the whipping boy for every ‘sin’ in the re-written history books that cast him as the villain.
I have read screeds of well written opinion pieces by scholars and pundits seeking to understand the Trump phenomena and the huge shift in the global political landscape that is going on. Of all of them, the following published in the Wall Street Journal comes closest to my own understanding, and expresses it far better than I ever could.
Trump and the Rise of the Unprotected
Why political professionals are struggling to make sense of the world they created.
Feb. 25, 2016 8:02 p.m. ET
We’re in a funny moment. Those who do politics for a living, some of them quite brilliant, are struggling to comprehend the central fact of the Republican primary race, while regular people have already absorbed what has happened and is happening.
But in my experience any non-political person on the street, when asked who will win, not only knows but gets a look as if you’re teasing him. Trump, they say.
In America now only normal people are capable of seeing the obvious.
But actually that’s been true for a while, and is how we got in the position we’re in.
There are many answers and reasons, but my thoughts keep revolving around the idea of protection. It is a theme that has been something of a preoccupation in this space over the years, but I think I am seeing it now grow into an overall political dynamic throughout the West.
There are the protected and the unprotected. The protected make public policy. The unprotected live in it. The unprotected are starting to push back, powerfully.
The protected are the accomplished, the secure, the successful—those who have power or access to it. They are protected from much of the roughness of the world. More to the point, they are protected from the world they have created.
I want to call them the elite to load the rhetorical dice, but let’s stick with the protected.
They are figures in government, politics and media. They live in nice neighborhoods, safe ones. Their families function, their kids go to good schools, they’ve got some money. All of these things tend to isolate them, or provide buffers. Some of them—in Washington it is important officials in the executive branch or on the Hill; in Brussels, significant figures in the European Union—literally have their own security details.
Because they are protected they feel they can do pretty much anything, impose any reality. They’re insulated from many of the effects of their own decisions.
One issue obviously roiling the U.S. and Western Europe is immigration. It is the issue of the moment, a real and concrete one but also a symbolic one: It stands for all the distance between governments and their citizens.
It is of course the issue that made Donald Trump.
Britain will probably leave the European Union over it. In truth immigration is one front in that battle, but it is the most salient because of the European refugee crisis and the failure of the protected class to address it realistically and in a way that offers safety to the unprotected.
If you are an unprotected American—one with limited resources and negligible access to power—you have absorbed some lessons from the past 20 years’ experience of illegal immigration. You know the Democrats won’t protect you and the Republicans won’t help you. Both parties refused to control the border. The Republicans were afraid of being called illiberal, racist, of losing a demographic for a generation. The Democrats wanted to keep the issue alive to use it as a wedge against the Republicans and to establish themselves as owners of the Hispanic vote.
Many Americans suffered from illegal immigration—its impact on labor markets, financial costs, crime, the sense that the rule of law was collapsing. But the protected did fine—more workers at lower wages. No effect of illegal immigration was likely to hurt them personally.
It was good for the protected. But the unprotected watched and saw. They realized the protected were not looking out for them, and they inferred that they were not looking out for the country, either.
The unprotected came to think they owed the establishment—another word for the protected—nothing, no particular loyalty, no old allegiance.
Mr. Trump came from that.
Similarly in Europe, citizens on the ground in member nations came to see the EU apparatus as a racket—an elite that operated in splendid isolation, looking after its own while looking down on the people.
In Germany the incident that tipped public opinion against Chancellor Angela Merkel’s liberal refugee policy happened on New Year’s Eve in the public square of Cologne. Packs of men said to be recent migrants groped and molested groups of young women. It was called a clash of cultures, and it was that, but it was also wholly predictable if any policy maker had cared to think about it. And it was not the protected who were the victims—not a daughter of EU officials or members of the Bundestag. It was middle- and working-class girls—the unprotected, who didn’t even immediately protest what had happened to them. They must have understood that in the general scheme of things they’re nobodies.
What marks this political moment, in Europe and the U.S., is the rise of the unprotected. It is the rise of people who don’t have all that much against those who’ve been given many blessings and seem to believe they have them, not because they’re fortunate, but because they’re better.
You see the dynamic in many spheres. In Hollywood, as we still call it, where they make our rough culture, they are careful to protect their own children from its ill effects. In places with failing schools, they choose not to help them through the school liberation movement—charter schools, choice, etc.—because they fear to go up against the most reactionary professional group in America, the teachers unions. They let the public schools flounder. But their children go to the best private schools.
This is a terrible feature of our age—that we are governed by protected people who don’t seem to care that much about their unprotected fellow citizens.
And a country really can’t continue this way.
In wise governments the top is attentive to the realities of the lives of normal people, and careful about their anxieties. That’s more or less how America used to be. There didn’t seem to be so much distance between the top and the bottom.
Now is seems the attitude of the top half is: You’re on your own. Get with the program, little racist.
Social philosophers are always saying the underclass must re-moralize. Maybe it is the overclass that must re-moralize.
I don’t know if the protected see how serious this moment is, or their role in it.